Composition vs Inheritance vs Abstraction — When, Why, and Where to Use Them

As an experienced software engineer, one of the most important design decisions you’ll make is choosing how to model relationships between classes — and that starts with understanding Composition, Inheritance, and Abstraction.

Each has its strengths and trade-offs. Used correctly, they make your code clean, testable, and extensible. Used poorly, they lead to tight coupling, fragile hierarchies, and spaghetti architecture.

This post breaks down:

• ✅ What each concept means
• 📌 When and why to use it
• ⚠️ What to avoid
• 🧪 Practical examples

---

🧱 1. Inheritance — “Is-A” Relationship

Inheritance allows a class to extend another class and inherit its methods and fields.

class Animal {
    void eat() {
        System.out.println("Eating...");
    }
}

class Dog extends Animal {
    void bark() {
        System.out.println("Barking...");
    }
}

✅ When to Use:

• There’s a clear “is-a” relationship (e.g., Dog is an Animal)
• You want to reuse behavior across similar types
• You want to specialize behavior through overriding

⚠️ Don’t Use When:

• The classes don’t logically share identity
• You’re forcing inheritance just to reuse methods (use composition instead)

🔥 Why It’s Powerful:

• Easy to implement polymorphism (Animal a = new Dog())
• Reduces code duplication (base behavior in superclasses)

---

🧩 2. Composition — “Has-A” Relationship

Composition means a class has another class as a field and delegates behavior to it.

class Engine {
    void start() {
        System.out.println("Engine starting...");
    }
}

class Car {
    private Engine engine = new Engine();

    void drive() {
        engine.start();
        System.out.println("Car is driving...");
    }
}

✅ When to Use:

• There’s a “has-a” relationship (e.g., Car has an Engine)
• You want flexibility to change behavior at runtime (strategy pattern)
• You want to follow composition over inheritance

⚠️ Don’t Use When:

• You’re modeling a real hierarchy or polymorphic type system
• Behavior is better expressed through extension rather than delegation

🔥 Why It’s Powerful:

• Promotes loose coupling
• Easier to test and extend
• Avoids fragile base class problem

---

🧠 3. Abstraction — Hiding Complexity Behind Contracts

Abstraction focuses on what an object does, not how. It can be achieved via abstract classes or interfaces.

interface PaymentMethod {
    void pay(double amount);
}

class CreditCard implements PaymentMethod {
    public void pay(double amount) {
        System.out.println("Paid $" + amount + " using credit card.");
    }
}

✅ When to Use:

• You want to hide implementation details
• You want to define a contract or capability
• You need to support polymorphism and interchangeable behaviors

⚠️ Don’t Use When:

• The abstraction leaks too many implementation details
• You’re overengineering (don’t abstract things that never change)

🔥 Why It’s Powerful:

• Decouples interface from implementation
• Enables plug-and-play architectures (e.g., PaymentMethod can be PayPal, Card, Crypto)
• Great for testability and dependency injection

---

🧪 Summary Table

Feature	Description	When to Use	Avoid If…
Inheritance	“is-a” hierarchy	You have base logic to reuse	It causes tight coupling or deep trees
Composition	“has-a” relationship	You need flexible and reusable code	You’re forcing object glue unnecessarily
Abstraction	Hide the “how”, expose “what”	You need polymorphism or contracts	The abstraction adds unnecessary layers

---

💡 Final Thoughts

• Use Inheritance for a strong hierarchy when types share identity and behavior.
• Use Composition when you want flexibility and separation of concerns.
• Use Abstraction to enforce contracts and enable extensibility without tight coupling.

The best systems don’t pick one — they combine all three appropriately.

🧠 “Favor composition over inheritance, and always abstract behavior that may vary.”